flying_bear (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
flying_bear) wrote2015-06-11 02:06 pm
flying_bear) wrote2015-06-11 02:06 pm
Entry tags:
Новая статья по основам КМ
Quantum theory as a description of robust experiments: Application to Stern-Gerlach and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments
We propose and develop the thesis that the quantum theoretical description of experiments emerges from the desire to organize experimental data such that the description of the system under scrutiny and the one used to acquire the data are separated as much as possible. Application to the Stern-Gerlach and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments are shown to support this thesis. General principles of logical inference which have been shown to lead to the Schr\"odinger and Pauli equation and the probabilistic descriptions of the Stern-Gerlach and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments, are used to demonstrate that the condition for the separation procedure to yield the quantum theoretical description is intimately related to the assumptions that the observed events are independent and that the data generated by these experiments is robust with respect to small changes of the conditions under which the experiment is carried out.
We propose and develop the thesis that the quantum theoretical description of experiments emerges from the desire to organize experimental data such that the description of the system under scrutiny and the one used to acquire the data are separated as much as possible. Application to the Stern-Gerlach and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments are shown to support this thesis. General principles of logical inference which have been shown to lead to the Schr\"odinger and Pauli equation and the probabilistic descriptions of the Stern-Gerlach and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments, are used to demonstrate that the condition for the separation procedure to yield the quantum theoretical description is intimately related to the assumptions that the observed events are independent and that the data generated by these experiments is robust with respect to small changes of the conditions under which the experiment is carried out.
no subject
Мне не нравится наивный энтузиазм, зачастую переходящий в wishful thinking. Доказать я (пока?) ничего не могу - ни что может, ни что не может.
no subject
А если какой-нибудь совсем маленький компьютер таки построят - Вы будете более благожелательно к этой деятельности относиться?
В "жизни", видимо, часто добиваются успеха те, кто прет напролом не очень задумываясь о правильности своих действий. Интересно - можно ли так действовать в науке?
no subject
Там вся фишка, чтобы построить scalable quantum computer. Который может быть и достаточно большим.
Конечно, если это сделают, это будет грандиозное научное достижение. Насколько понимаю, никакой ясности - можно ли это сделать - пока нет.
В науке, наверно, можно, но страшно. Вопрос личного риска. Как и в жизни. Можно ведь так всю жизнь на полную ерунду и потратить. Абыдна.
no subject
no subject
no subject
В математике мне вспомнилась история создания неевклидовой геометрии. Гаусс осторожничал - а Лобачевский шел напролом.